Life imprisonment implies a jail term for the convict’s
entire life, the Supreme Court has held, clearing a misconception on this
sentence.
Constitution Bench of SC
said in its Landmark judgement of 1980
on criterion for imposing death penalty needs a “Fresh Look” as there has been
“ No Uniformity ” in following its principles on what constitutes “ The Rarest
of Rare ” cases.
“It appears to us there
is a misconception that a prisoner serving a life sentence has an indefeasible
right to be released on completion of either fourteen years or twenty years
imprisonment. The prisoner has no such right. “
“A convict undergoing
life imprisonment is expected to remain in custody till the end of his life,
subject to any remission granted by the appropriate government,” said SC .
The bench, however, clarified that under remission the
appropriate government cannot reduce the period of sentence less than 14 years
for a life convict.
“ In the case of a
convict undergoing life imprisonment, he will be in custody for an
indeterminate period. Therefore, remissions earned by or awarded to such a life
convict are only notional. In his case, to reduce the period of incarceration,
a specific order under Section 432 of the CrPC will have to be passed by the
appropriate government. However, the reduced period cannot be less than 14
years as per Section 433-A of the CrPC,” the Apex Court said.
The apex court order
also seeks to put an end to the practice of en-masse release of the convicts by
various governments on “ Festive ” occasions and said each release requires a
case-by-case basis scrutiny.
No comments:
Post a Comment